Skip to content
Levi Brackman (Rabbi, PhD)

Scholar, Podcaster. Author, Seeker, Social Scientist, Entrepreneur

Levi Brackman (Rabbi, PhD)

Scholar, Podcaster. Author, Seeker, Social Scientist, Entrepreneur

Guns & Roses: Are They Compatible?

Levi Brackman, March 19, 2006May 7, 2017

When I was a child growing up in London, my Mom strictly forbade us to play with toy guns. Other friends received toy guns as birthday presents from their parents and grandparents, but no such toy was ever to be found in our home. In fact, my parents never let us watch any movie that was even remotely violent. Mom’s logic was simple: children who play with violent games learn violence. She taught us that a gun was designed with one purpose, to end life. I agree with her that a gun is not a desirable thing for a child to play with and this is the way I am bringing up my own children too.

We are hearing about extreme youth violence all over the place. Last week a teenager was arrested in Evergreen for owning and playing with real firearms. He had a website that featured pictures of himself with guns and statements threatening extreme violence against strangers. Evergreen is known to be a peaceful place. However, widespread youth violence is indicative of a very worrying trend that is setting in all across the Western world including Israel.

 

In my view, this nasty trend has got nothing to do with whether people should have the right to bear arms. It has everything to do with the attitude of parents.

 

Young children are like a clean sheet of paper. Everything that they see and hear makes major impressions upon them. We as parents have the responsibility to ensure that the impressions are positive and constructive. In some circumstances, people must be allowed to bear arms and defend themselves. However, we must also defend our children. As a former high school teacher, I know that children are in every way the product of their parents and that, to understand them properly, you have to meet the parents.

 

The Proverbs offer us timeless wisdom about parenting. “One who spares his rod hates his child, but he who loves him disciplines him in his youth[1].”  Many of the commentaries maintain that the rod mentioned in the proverb does not mean literally hitting the child; rather it is a euphemism for strict discipline. Clearly, you can discipline a child without hitting him. In fact, most parents who hit their children do so out of frustration and anger – something disapproved of in Jewish law.

 

This proverb teaches us that we must discipline our children, which includes giving the right time and attention and not spoiling them with whatever they crave. It means that parents must take notice of what their children are doing, what they are playing with, what they are watching and who they are hanging out with. Proper discipline is in fact tantamount to teaching. It takes time and energy and involves a whole lot more than delivering a quick smack or giving in to a child’s tantrum.

 

There is another, more obscure proverb that contains further insight and wisdom. “Train the child according to his way; even when he is old he will not depart from it[2].” Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liady, the founder of the School of Kabbalah, observed that “according to his way” implies that there is his way and then there is the true way. He goes on to ask why we would want to teach the child his way rather than the authentic way. His answer is wonderfully profound. There are two stages we go through in life, a beginner’s level and an advanced one, a child’s stage and an adult stage[3].

 

Let us use the teaching of non-violence to illustrate this point. If we teach our children never to use violence even when playing, although they may not understand why we insist on this, nonetheless it gives them a solid anti-violence foundation, which will help them resist violent urges as adults.

 

Thus, childhood training acts as a safety net, ensuring that we never fall below a certain ethical standard. The same is true in all matters of morals. For example, it has been a Jewish tradition for hundreds of years that on Passover’s Seder night the children steal the Afikomen (piece of matzo that must be eaten later on in the evening) and then return it only after being promised a present by the adult leading the Seder. The leaders of the school of Kabbalah objected to this tradition and did not allow their children to steal the Afikomen. They said that they would not allow their children to steal even in jest.

 

The logic is clear. If we want our children to stand the tests of moral and ethical behaviour and decision-making as adults, they must have solid moral and ethical foundations as children.

 

Thus, if the training a child receives is according to their ways, meaning, even if it is a bit intense – we don’t let them play with toy guns, steal the Afikomen or play violent video games – then when they get older and their moral and ethical judgment is put to the test, they will not depart from the ethics they were taught as children.

 

My children may deserve a smack once in a while, but I will never lift my hand to them, because I do not want them ever to think that violence, of any sort, is a legitimate way to deal with a problem. 

 

Shouting and screaming self-righteously about the behavior of our youth is wrong and worthless if it does not make us think seriously about the way we entertain, educate and bring up our own children.


[1] Proverbs, 13:24

[2] Proverbs, 22:6

[3] This is an adaptation of what Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liady writes in Chinuch Katan. There however Rabbi Schneur Zalman is talking about the process of reaching spiritual maturity and integrity. 

Ethics

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

Succession of Leadership in the Lubavitch/Habad Movement

March 19, 2003July 19, 2023

This essay will explore the succession of leadership in the Habad Hassidic movement. It will attempt to understand why Habad has preferred dynastic succession over disciple succession. We will also attempt to demonstrate that disciple succession was deemed legitimate at the earliest stages of the Habad movement and that the…

Read More

Is Free Healthcare Our Moral Duty?

July 10, 2009May 7, 2017

The argument about healthcare in the United States is heating. According to many on the right the United States has the best healthcare in the world and it should not be tampered with. According to the left the entire healthcare system needs to be overhauled because, in their view, it…

Read More

Moral Compass When It’s a Choice Between Two Evils

August 23, 2013May 7, 2017

The world is watching with a sense of horror at events unfolding in Syria and Egypt. Just this past week in Syria there have been credible allegations of chemical weapons use against citizens. In Egypt, protesters have been killed in the streets of Cairo by their own military. Yet it…

Read More

About Me and this Site

  • Navigating My Writing
  • Short Bio
  • Join Newsletter

Three Latest Posts

  • Before Bezos and Amazon: The Biblical Covenantal Relationship Had an Inbuilt ‘Day One’ Mindset September 20, 2024
  • Rabbinic Reinterpretation of the Torah: Ethical Adjustments in the Oral Law – Ki Teitzei September 16, 2024
  • Navigating Nepotism and Divine Choice in Torah Portion Tsav March 29, 2024

Writing in Chronological Order

Writing by Category

Search the Site

©2025 Levi Brackman (Rabbi, PhD) | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes